我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division Where? 香港 Compared with London GCE Sociology, HKALE sucks 同我有咩關係？
我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division Where? 香港 Compared with London GCE Sociology, HKALE sucks
我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division Where? 香港
我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division Where?
我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division
Sociology Politics and Public Administration Linguistics Ethnicity History(middle-east,west europe) 對呢幾科超撚有興趣 所以好希望讀到bss或者ba
fine art都冇都叫"人文學科"? 話時話連Philosophy 都冇 Philosophy is the univeral set of all discipline. Here we focus on those related to society instead of just personal.
fine art都冇都叫"人文學科"? 話時話連Philosophy 都冇
fine art都冇都叫"人文學科"?
fine art都冇都叫"人文學科"? 話時話連Philosophy 都冇 Philosophy is the univeral set of all discipline. Here we focus on those related to society instead of just personal. 你所指既哲學係純粹指知識既追求 呢個定義未免太過時啦吧
請附原因: 1. 社會學 (Sociology) 2. 心理學 (Psychology) 3. 政治及公共行政學(Politics and Public Administration) 4. 社會工作及社會行政學(Social Work and Social Administration)5. 地理學(Geography) 6. 文化研究(Cultural Studies) 7. 人類學(Anthropology) 8. 經濟學 (Economics)(勉強) 9. 語言學 (Linguistics) 10. 歷史及文學 (History and Literature) I prefer them all. For me, humanity=social science, which is a key component of liberal arts education. So unconditional interests of them should be implemented. They (10 items) all involves social philsophies such as feminism and utilitarianism. Most importantly, I can make use of them to build up my own theory, i.e. concern and disipline my thought as the aim of liberal arts education. As reported by my ex-classmate as CUHK goers, many hate adminstration because it is too business-wise.
請附原因: 1. 社會學 (Sociology) 2. 心理學 (Psychology) 3. 政治及公共行政學(Politics and Public Administration) 4. 社會工作及社會行政學(Social Work and Social Administration)5. 地理學(Geography) 6. 文化研究(Cultural Studies) 7. 人類學(Anthropology) 8. 經濟學 (Economics)(勉強) 9. 語言學 (Linguistics) 10. 歷史及文學 (History and Literature) I prefer them all. For me, humanity=social science, which is a key component of liberal arts education. So unconditional interests of them should be implemented. They (10 items) all involves social philsophies such as feminism and utilitarianism. Most importantly, I can make use of them to build up my own theory, i.e. concern and disipline my thought as the aim of liberal arts education.
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數 Therefore, the literature learning system is quite closed. The syllabuse designer should introduce methodology to teach students how to bulid up their own concepts for elaboration. 文學界一向都有既定既共同思路，就好似古文既翻譯解釋大多只有一、兩種，根本無法改變，因為文學係客觀既存在，你點樣去賞析，其實自由度好有限 So do you feel that literature, like science, should be further branched? (e.g. Euclidean Geometry Versus Hilbert Space)
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數 Therefore, the literature learning system is quite closed. The syllabuse designer should introduce methodology to teach students how to bulid up their own concepts for elaboration. 文學界一向都有既定既共同思路，就好似古文既翻譯解釋大多只有一、兩種，根本無法改變，因為文學係客觀既存在，你點樣去賞析，其實自由度好有限
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數 Therefore, the literature learning system is quite closed. The syllabuse designer should introduce methodology to teach students how to bulid up their own concepts for elaboration.
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2"
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明?
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)?
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既
請附原因: 1. 社會學 (Sociology) 2. 心理學 (Psychology) 3. 政治及公共行政學(Politics and Public Administration) 4. 社會工作及社會行政學(Social Work and Social Administration)5. 地理學(Geography) 6. 文化研究(Cultural Studies) 7. 人類學(Anthropology) 8. 經濟學 (Economics)(勉強) 9. 語言學 (Linguistics) 10. 歷史及文學 (History and Literature) I prefer them all. For me, humanity=social science, which is a key component of liberal arts education. So unconditional interests of them should be implemented. They (10 items) all involves social philsophies such as feminism and utilitarianism. Most importantly, I can make use of them to build up my own theory, i.e. concern and disipline my thought as the aim of liberal arts education. As reported by my ex-classmate as CUHK goers, many hate adminstration because it is too business-wise. . 政治及公共行政學(Politics and Public Administration) 4. 社會工作及社會行政學(Social Work and Social Administration 其實呢兩科係拆出來，就好似乜乜醫學資訊(果類)，乜乜物流工程 都係多鳩餘
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 歷史就係base on the fact that 無得話如果當日點點點 好似你條問題咁 只會變作英文作文而唔係歷史 唔該唔好可用自己觀點套落去 作文同事實係兩件事 呢個唔係創意問題！ It is your own assumption. Creativity (case considering) is neccessary because fact (e.g. dynasty chronicles) can be fibricatedfabricated according to the ancient author's perference. Otherwise, history will stoop to 以訛傳訛
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 歷史就係base on the fact that 無得話如果當日點點點 好似你條問題咁 只會變作英文作文而唔係歷史 唔該唔好可用自己觀點套落去 作文同事實係兩件事 呢個唔係創意問題！
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數 Therefore, the literature learning system is quite closed. The syllabuse designer should introduce methodology to teach students how to bulid up their own concepts for elaboration. 文學界一向都有既定既共同思路，就好似古文既翻譯解釋大多只有一、兩種，根本無法改變，因為文學係客觀既存在，你點樣去賞析，其實自由度好有限 So do you feel that literature, like science, should be further branched? (e.g. Euclidean Geometry Versus Hilbert Space) 你係指將文學再細分？
Sociology Politics and Public Administration Linguistics Ethnicity History(middle-east,west europe) 對呢幾科超撚有興趣 所以好希望讀到bss或者ba HKU is your choice. As to ethnicity, you may opt to include this as your MPhi or PHD topic.
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 歷史就係base on the fact that 無得話如果當日點點點 好似你條問題咁 只會變作英文作文而唔係歷史 唔該唔好可用自己觀點套落去 作文同事實係兩件事 呢個唔係創意問題！ It is your own assumption. Creativity (case considering) is neccessary because fact (e.g. dynasty chronicles) can be fibricatedfabricated according to the ancient author's perference. Otherwise, history will stoop to 以訛傳訛 樓主係咪西方學派多啲？ 因為中國重於「以史為鑑」 加埋儒家精神 基本上無需要亦無興趣去推測如果 多數腳踏實地分析 只有軍事學、帝皇術先有需要去推算 當然歷史都包括以上兩樣 不過整體而言又唔多覺中國歷史需要演算
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數 Therefore, the literature learning system is quite closed. The syllabuse designer should introduce methodology to teach students how to bulid up their own concepts for elaboration. 文學界一向都有既定既共同思路，就好似古文既翻譯解釋大多只有一、兩種，根本無法改變，因為文學係客觀既存在，你點樣去賞析，其實自由度好有限 So do you feel that literature, like science, should be further branched? (e.g. Euclidean Geometry Versus Hilbert Space) 你係指將文學再細分？ Different schools (學派) in literature open new branches and farm it.
Sociology Politics and Public Administration Linguistics Ethnicity History(middle-east,west europe) 對呢幾科超撚有興趣 所以好希望讀到bss或者ba HKU is your choice. As to ethnicity, you may opt to include this as your MPhi or PHD topic. 多謝提點 未來野就未諗住 bss有無科係包括ethnicity
fine art都冇都叫"人文學科"? 話時話連Philosophy 都冇 Philosophy is the univeral set of all discipline. Here we focus on those related to society instead of just personal. 你所指既哲學係純粹指知識既追求 呢個定義未免太過時啦吧 True, if you ignore mathematics as another branch of philosophy.
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數 Therefore, the literature learning system is quite closed. The syllabuse designer should introduce methodology to teach students how to bulid up their own concepts for elaboration. 文學界一向都有既定既共同思路，就好似古文既翻譯解釋大多只有一、兩種，根本無法改變，因為文學係客觀既存在，你點樣去賞析，其實自由度好有限 So do you feel that literature, like science, should be further branched? (e.g. Euclidean Geometry Versus Hilbert Space) 你係指將文學再細分？ Different schools (學派) in literature open new branches and farm it. 文學界根本無咩所謂學派大到可以開多條新line
fine art都冇都叫"人文學科"? 話時話連Philosophy 都冇 Philosophy is the univeral set of all discipline. Here we focus on those related to society instead of just personal. 你所指既哲學係純粹指知識既追求 呢個定義未免太過時啦吧 True, if you ignore mathematics as another branch of philosophy. 呢度又係要分中西哲學… 中國儒、墨、法、農等不嬲都重民生社會 由人到家及國 唔可以話唔係人文一項 樓主講純數哲學有啲偷換槪念 係大學乜嘢科讀到上去都叫哲學啦 唔係邊有master of philosophy 所以唔好為一談噃
烏大龜第二代咩科出身？ 有興趣想知
烏大龜第二代咩科出身？ 有興趣想知 I am just a small potato: 2007 HKALE graduate, failed in CL&C, get all 3 and UE AL passed, having teased by MIT yr 1 classmates , and now being IVE ICT software engineering student.
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 歷史就係base on the fact that 無得話如果當日點點點 好似你條問題咁 只會變作英文作文而唔係歷史 唔該唔好可用自己觀點套落去 作文同事實係兩件事 呢個唔係創意問題！ It is your own assumption. Creativity (case considering) is neccessary because fact (e.g. dynasty chronicles) can be fibricatedfabricated according to the ancient author's perference. Otherwise, history will stoop to 以訛傳訛 樓主係咪西方學派多啲？ 因為中國重於「以史為鑑」 加埋儒家精神 基本上無需要亦無興趣去推測如果 多數腳踏實地分析 只有軍事學、帝皇術先有需要去推算 當然歷史都包括以上兩樣 不過整體而言又唔多覺中國歷史需要演算 But with globalization, Chinese history, if with learning paradigm unchanged, will be difficult to be in conjunction with development of World History. Also, Classic Confucianism is but one of the political stablization means
烏大龜第二代咩科出身？ 有興趣想知 I am just a small potato: 2007 HKALE graduate, failed in CL&C, get all 3 and UE AL passed, having teased by MIT yr 1 classmates , and now being IVE ICT software engineering student. 3 AL = PMATH(E) + CHEM (E) + PHY (D)