請附原因: 1. 社會學 (Sociology) 2. 心理學 (Psychology) 3. 政治及公共行政學(Politics and Public Administration) 4. 社會工作及社會行政學(Social Work and Social Administration)5. 地理學(Geography) 6. 文化研究(Cultural Studies) 7. 人類學(Anthropology) 8. 經濟學 (Economics)(勉強) 9. 語言學 (Linguistics) 10. 歷史及文學 (History and Literature) I prefer them all. For me, humanity=social science, which is a key component of liberal arts education. So unconditional interests of them should be implemented. They (10 items) all involves social philsophies such as feminism and utilitarianism. Most importantly, I can make use of them to build up my own theory, i.e. concern and disipline my thought as the aim of liberal arts education.
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2"
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明?
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)?
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? 好心咪一竹竿打一船人 二來你呢定義文史人先 讀史分人、地、事 重心唔同角度唔同喎 中文更加 無論創作定研究都分古、近、當三個世界 你勉強可以話古近可以抄吓 當代好難啫 而且係咪事後孔明 好多時對人多過對事 「天下文章一大抄」就要睇文章個思想內容再定斷 呢以你呢句真係︰此言差矣
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數
10. 歷史及文學 (History and Literature)
我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 歷史就係base on the fact that 無得話如果當日點點點 好似你條問題咁 只會變作英文作文而唔係歷史 唔該唔好可用自己觀點套落去 作文同事實係兩件事 呢個唔係創意問題！
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 歷史就係base on the fact that 無得話如果當日點點點 好似你條問題咁 只會變作英文作文而唔係歷史 唔該唔好可用自己觀點套落去 作文同事實係兩件事 呢個唔係創意問題！ It is your own assumption. Creativity (case considering) is neccessary because fact (e.g. dynasty chronicles) can be fibricatedfabricated according to the ancient author's perference. Otherwise, history will stoop to 以訛傳訛
除左8 樣樣都有興趣
我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division Where?
我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division Where? 香港
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數 Therefore, the literature learning system is quite closed. The syllabuse designer should introduce methodology to teach students how to bulid up their own concepts for elaboration.
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? 好心咪一竹竿打一船人 二來你呢定義文史人先 讀史分人、地、事 重心唔同角度唔同喎 中文更加 無論創作定研究都分古、近、當三個世界 你勉強可以話古近可以抄吓 當代好難啫 而且係咪事後孔明 好多時對人多過對事 「天下文章一大抄」就要睇文章個思想內容再定斷 呢以你呢句真係︰此言差矣 The leitmotif is that, studying lierature and history should be conceptual for them to be widely applicable in daily life. Therefore, if history textbook authors know how to use modelling, it would be a bliss to all pure science stream students who originally want to study L&H.
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? Many thinks that those study history know showing factual details off. I can darely tell you that if examination style change permits, those studying history can actually be creative. For example, designing a OPEN essay question below: "If Adolf Hitler co-operate with Soviet Union, deduce how the economic system will change when they succeed in WW2" 我讀文學出黎既 事後孔明又無，不過其實真係一大抄， 幾乎所有論文都係響幾十本書入面引出黎既 讀左四年，淨係學識用文字吹水同多佔字數 Therefore, the literature learning system is quite closed. The syllabuse designer should introduce methodology to teach students how to bulid up their own concepts for elaboration. 文學界一向都有既定既共同思路，就好似古文既翻譯解釋大多只有一、兩種，根本無法改變，因為文學係客觀既存在，你點樣去賞析，其實自由度好有限
文學界一向都有既定既共同思路，就好似古文既翻譯解釋大多只有一、兩種，根本無法改變，因為文學係客觀既存在，你點樣去賞析，其實自由度好有限
10 我就係讀呢味野出身既 Do you find that in the 10th there are many black sheeps that good at impressional lyrics without insight (i.e. being hindsights)? To be simple: 覺不覺得文史人大多「天下文章一大抄」、當事後孔明? 好心咪一竹竿打一船人 二來你呢定義文史人先 讀史分人、地、事 重心唔同角度唔同喎 中文更加 無論創作定研究都分古、近、當三個世界 你勉強可以話古近可以抄吓 當代好難啫 而且係咪事後孔明 好多時對人多過對事 「天下文章一大抄」就要睇文章個思想內容再定斷 呢以你呢句真係︰此言差矣 The leitmotif is that, studying lierature and history should be conceptual for them to be widely applicable in daily life. Therefore, if history textbook authors know how to use modelling, it would be a bliss to all pure science stream students who originally want to study L&H. 我想講…香港中學一早無咗真正嘅文史
我地學校分Humanities同Sociology兩個division Where? 香港 Compared with London GCE Sociology, HKALE sucks